Death in Adventdalen Valley Rotten carcasses can be a macabre sight in nature. But they can also be a great gift in terms of biodiversity. By:Bjørnar Leknes Published:08. October 2021 kl. 09:00 Updated:08. October 2021 kl. 10:33 Main body Reindeer carcasses: The picture shows a carcass from the winter of 2019/20 and was taken on the scree slopes in Todalen valley which is one of Adventdalen’s side valleys. In the background, you can see Nord University botanists Mie Pirk Arnberg and Rachel Blaalid preparing to map the vegetation. Photo: Jan Eivind Østnes. Sam Steyaert has a special passion. He is overly interested in death. Or to be more precise: he conducts research on the ecological effects of carcasses. He is head of the research project called ‘REINCAR’, which is a contraction of the words ‘reindeer’, ‘reincarnation’ and ‘carcasses’. Different Attitudes Towards Carcasses Quadrat analysis: Doctoral research fellow Mie Prik Arnberg carries out quadrat mapping of the vegetation on a sample plot in Mälardalen valley (one of Adventdalen’s side valleys). In the background, Rachel conducts similar analyses on the carcass plot. Photo: Jan Eivind Østnes. In the majestic surroundings of Adventdalen valley on Svalbard, Nord University Associate Professor Steyaert and a handful of other researchers have just completed a new season in the field. It is now time to analyse data and various soil samples. “In certain European countries, it is common practice to remove carcasses from nature and dispose of them. Some of the arguments for doing this revolve around hygiene and the spread of disease. Another reason is so that people are not exposed to macabre sights and nauseating smells. In some ways, this is a real shame”, he says.Steyaert believes it is important that ordinary people should get to see and experience ‘the bright side of death’, as he calls it. “It is a necessary and good thing that people get to see the positive side of leaving carcasses to rot away in their natural surroundings. A lot of life is associated with these carcasses, and they are a natural part of the ecosystem. Why remove them when they are actually a high-quality resource for many organisms?” he asks. At the same time, however, he agrees that there are also good arguments for removing them. But we will come back to that.Horror on the Hardangervidda Mountain Plateau Studying carcasses on Svalbard: Project leader Sam Steyaert with the field team in the background. The picture is taken in Hiorthhamn while the team waits for the boat back to Longyearbyen after a day’s work in the field. Photo: Sam Steyaert. A few years ago, the carcass-researcher ended up in the global media after an extremely rare incident occurred on the Hardangervidda mountain plateau. In 2016, a lightning strike killed 323 wild reindeer, and Steyaert dropped everything he was doing, gathered his team and established a research field at the site. The goal was to find out what type of ecological effects such a mass death of animals in such a small geographical area had on the surrounding vegetation and biodiversity. He has not yet completed these studies, but he has now also focused his attention on Adventdalen valley on Svalbard in order conduct the same kind of research. The biggest difference is that the carcasses in Adventdalen valley are scattered over a large geographical area. “On the Hardangervidda mountain plateau, we see a very strong effect on the vegetation. The area where the carcasses have been left is completely free of vegetation. In addition, we see that the vegetation is gradually growing back at the outer boundary in the form of moss and flowers.” “On Svalbard, however, the setting is completely different. In Adventdalen valley, one can find carcasses and remains of bones pretty much everywhere in the landscape.Read more about the Svalbard reindeer: Svalbard reindeer – Store norske leksikon (snl.no)Carcasses and Gourmet Meals Drone pictures: The picture is taken by a drone at heights of 10 to 100 meters above the ground with an ordinary camera. The picture gives a good illustration of the vegetation surrounding the carcass. Photo: Sam Steyaert. So far, the work on Svalbard has mainly focused on vegetation responses. These are investigated both through traditional quadrat analyses and modern drone technology. Associate Professor Jan Eivind Østnes is part of Steyaert’s research group, and explains that the number of carcasses can vary greatly from year to year in Adventdalen valley.“Some years, when the ground is covered in ice so that the reindeer are not able to access enough nutrition, many of them die. This is what happened in 2019. According to the Norwegian Polar Institute, there were over 200 carcasses in the valley. In other years, there may only be a few new carcasses”, he says. “But why is this so important to research?” “Carcasses attract many different organisms, everything from microorganisms to plants, insects, birds and mammals. The reason is that dead animals are a gourmet meal of the highest quality that many organisms can benefit from.” “This is interesting in itself, but we still don’t know enough about how much or the ways in which the carcasses are important for the ecosystem. We are looking for clues that can document all forms of ecological influence on the vegetation, soil and reproduction in birds and animals”, Steyaert says. Bird on a carcass: The picture shows a purple sandpiper visiting a carcass to eat insects (mostly larvae, but also adult insects). A carcass can provide good access to nutrition (gourmet meal) during a short and hectic season for birds nesting in the Arctic tundra. Photo: Jan Eivind Østnes. Collaboration with the Norwegian Polar Institute means that the project has access to key data in the form of GPS locations of carcasses. The Polar Institute has carried out systematic counts of reindeer over many years, both of live and dead animals. “This means that we can visit the locations and see how the vegetation has responded”, he says.New Life and Great BiodiversityØstnes explains that they primarily look at the effects of carcasses on the whole ecosystem. So far, they have mainly looked at vegetation response, where their fieldwork has focused on mapping all the carcass locations they have. “In addition to traditional vegetation analyses, we have used drones over each carcass to capture light spectrums that we can’t see with the naked eye, and which can help explain the carcass responses. We have also taken soil samples to study the soil chemistry and not least the soil biology in the form of microorganisms.” “What does a location in the tundra look like that has a carcass on it?” “We see that all the vegetation dies directly beneath where the carcass lies and covers the ground. We also see a pronounced response in the vegetation surrounding the carcass, especially where the terrain slopes away from the carcass. There, the nutrients from the carcass often produce a tremendous vegetation response.” “We also see that different types of species can start to grow next to the carcass compared to what has grown there previously. In the Arctic tundra, we still don’t know whether this increase in biodiversity is the result of a natural seed bank in the soil, or whether scavengers deposit the seeds through their excrement.Therefore, one would think that researchers bristle at the thought of removing carcasses from nature. But it is not that simple. Østnes says that it is more nuanced and there are two ways of looking at it.“A carcass that dies freely in nature should be left alone. On the other hand, many areas have very large moose populations due to the absence of natural predators. During the hunting season, many moose will be shot and their entrails are left at the kill site. There has been a discussion about whether one should leave the entrails in nature or whether one should remove and dispose of them.” “This discussion has arisen because some people are of the opinion that leaving the entrails behind could cause the build-up of unnaturally large populations of red foxes and other scavengers or large predators. This may come into conflict with commercial and outdoor interests. From an ecosystem perspective, there will in any case be a lot of carcass remains in areas with a lot of natural predators. “Therefore, one could argue that the imbalance in the ecosystem is man-made because human beings have taken on the role of an apex predator”, Steyaert says. Svalbard reindeer: The picture shows a bull and a cow. Svalbard reindeer are defined as a separate subspecies that shows both physiological and behavioural adaptations to life in the Arctic tundra. As an adaptation to reduce heat loss, they have developed a compact body, short legs, a short muzzle, a round head and small ears. They also have very thick winter fur compared to reindeer that live on the mainland. Photo: Jan Eivind Østnes. By:Bjørnar Leknes Published:08. October 2021 kl. 09:00 Updated:08. October 2021 kl. 10:33 Right bodyFacts about REINCAR on Svalbard A research project at Nord University that started in 2020. Main purpose: to investigate the ecological effects of reindeer carcasses. Project leader is Associate Professor Sam Steyaert, originally from Belgium. With him in this year’s field team is Associate Professor Jan Eivind Østnes, Associate Professor Gunnar Mikalsen Kvifte, Doctoral Research Fellow Mie Pirk Arnberg, Head Engineer Oddbjørn Larsen and master’s student Marit Bye from Nord University, Professor Andreas Zedrosser from the University of South-Eastern Norway and researcher Rakel Blaalid from the University of Bergen. Contact person Sam Steyaert Associate Professor 74 11 20 56 firstname.lastname@example.org Jan Eivind Østnes Associate Professor +47 74 11 21 25 +47 99032582 email@example.com Share on Facebook Share on Twitter E-mail Print this page Articles published on www.nord.no may be reprinted with reference to the original source. Images on www.nord.no may not be used without the written permission of the Communications Unit. Nord University takes no responsibility for the content of external websites linked to articles on www.nord.no.